What "tools" do humans have to provide whether the better explanation is whether God exists? The natural laws of science! What are these natural laws?

The First Law of Thermodynamics

The Second Law of Thermodynamics

The Law of Biogenesis

Provided below are brief explanations of these laws:

The First Law of Thermodynamics: Matter and Energy is neither created nor destroyed by natural processes.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics: This law applies to biology, chemistry, physics and many more. It tells you which way a process will go. This law will mathematically tell you that if you placed a ball on a hill the ball will roll down hill and not uphill. It tells you if you placed liquid water in a pot and heated it to 212 degrees Fahrenheit the water will vaporize and not freeze. There are countless further examples, but the 2nd law tells you a system will go from a higher energy state to a lower energy state over time. It teaches order will go to disorder over time (entropy).

The Law of Biogenesis: Life can not arise from nonlife; life only comes from previous life.

The First Law of Thermodynamics is strong evidence for a supernatural creator. Ask an atheist where did all the matter and energy in the Universe come from? If they say, "it came from nothing" they violate the 1st law of thermodynamics, which teaches matters and energy can not be created from nothing by natural means. What is a better explanation? Matter and energy had a supernatural origin. Is this scientifically provable? No, not 100% provable, but the evidence strongly supports this. This law of science contradicts the atheist idea that matter came from nothing though. Thus the atheist position requires blind faith to believe matter and energy came from nothing, whereas the Creationist position a supernatural God created matter and energy is supported by science and requires far less faith.

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is more evidence for a supernatural creator. There is tremendous order in the universe: your body, planetary motion, the water cycle etc. Where did this order originate? A natural law of science says not on its own; thus a better explanation is that order arose from an orderly intelligent entity. Who has blind faith? People who believe order arose by chance. Who has rational faith? Those who believe God gave order to the Universe. This evidence supports (but does not 100% prove) God exists.

Biogenesis is more evidence that God exists. How does an atheist refute the law of science that says life only comes form life? They don’t refute it, they can’t, they hate and ignore this basic question. Creationists believe life can not arise from non-life by natural means, there by agreeing with Biogenesis. Creationists believe life originated with a supernatural God. This is more evidence that God exists, but not 100% proof.

More evidence supporting Creation: genetics. What do we observe bacteria producing? Bacteria. Where do blue whales come from? Blue whales. Evolutionists based upon blind faith believe bacteria are the ancestors of blue whales. Creationists believe that bacteria can and will only produce bacteria and that blue whales can and only did come from blue whales. Which position is supported by the evidence and which is blind faith? It is obvious, the Evolution idea that bacteria are the ancestors of blue whales is blind faith, while the Creation position that bacteria can only make bacteria and blue whales can only make blue whales is supported by observation (evidence).

God’s existance is not 100% provable. But the laws of science and observation provide tremendous evidence God does exist. The natural laws of science falsify the notion everything in this Universe got here by natural means. The logical conclusion is both positions requrie faith. Creation requires a little faith, but an atheist must have blind faith since his position contradicts scientific laws and observation.